Quote
Originally posted by: snidely333Quote
Originally posted by: pjstroh
Civil Disobedience is the centerpiece of a philosophy embraced by numerous champions of civil liberty throughout history....Ghandi, MLK, Mandela. History generally rules it to be a constructive part of forming a more democratic society.
History looks less fondly upon uncivil disobedience ....like sending Ricin letters to the president to protest 2nd Amendment restrictions, for example
History looks favorably, at least to most Americans, at the dumping of the tea into Boston Harbor in 1773. That was certainly uncivil disobedience.
Wait, what does this have to do with the picket at the Cosmo?
On Civil Disobedience
From the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: ". . . civil disobedience is a public, non-violent and conscientious breach of law undertaken with the aim of bringing about a change in laws or government policies. On this account, the persons who practice civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their actions, as this shows their fidelity to the rule of law."
On this basis pjstroh is correct, . . . f'rinstance, Ghandi intended all his anti-Government activities to be legitimate civil disobedience. Sending ricin through the mails is nothing more than an attempt to do someone harm, regardless of the motivation, . . . and the act of the perpetrator is neither public, non-violent, nor conscientious, . . . and the perpetrator does not accept the legal consequences.
snidely333 is also correct. Although the Boston Tea Party was aimed at bringing about a change in Government policy, the participants wore disguises and were not willing to accept the legal consequences of their destruction of property. It was a Revolutionary Act.
snidely333 is also correct to question the relevance to the Culinary Union Local 226 picketing of the Cosmopolitan. The pickets are not violating a City ordinance to bring about change in Law or Government; they are just violating the Law to attract public attention to a labor dispute between their Union and an Employer. This is not civil disobedience; it is simply obstruction of traffic.