Georgia Republipigs pass Jim Crow 2.0

As mentioned before dekalb & Atlanta which is democratic & majority black have the option to provide the machines & precincts. 

little angry man lies (again) when he says polls close @ 5. They close at 7, except in cities where they close @ 8. 

What prevents anybody from getting a govt id, other than laziness?

As mentioned before dekalb & Atlanta which is democratic & majority black have the option to provide the machines & precincts. 

little angry man lies (again) when he says polls close @ 5. They close at 7, except in cities where they close @ 8. 

What prevents anybody from getting a govt id, other than laziness?

Originally posted by: tom

As mentioned before dekalb & Atlanta which is democratic & majority black have the option to provide the machines & precincts. 

little angry man lies (again) when he says polls close @ 5. They close at 7, except in cities where they close @ 8. 

What prevents anybody from getting a govt id, other than laziness?


Hate however you want, think whatever nonsense you want, Tommie-poo. I hereby anoint you our resident April Fool.

Originally posted by: Kevin Lewis

Hate however you want, think whatever nonsense you want, Tommie-poo. I hereby anoint you our resident April Fool.


This coming from the guy who wishes anybody who disagrees with him to die


Originally posted by: tom

This coming from the guy who wishes anybody who disagrees with him to die


Our April Fool hath spoken!

Candy, remember when you wrote, "Those of you who made "can't bring a drink of water" to voters in line an issue here are all falling for distortions of the truth...as usual?"

 

Well, thanks for the insult. I posted the actual text from the new law proving you wrong, and for some reason, you haven't responded.

 

So I have some questions:

Do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong?

Do you have the class to apologize for your gratuitous and inaccurate insult directed to me and others?

 

I don't know the answer to those questions, but we soon will, won't we?

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Candy, remember when you wrote, "Those of you who made "can't bring a drink of water" to voters in line an issue here are all falling for distortions of the truth...as usual?"

 

Well, thanks for the insult. I posted the actual text from the new law proving you wrong, and for some reason, you haven't responded.

 

So I have some questions:

Do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong?

Do you have the class to apologize for your gratuitous and inaccurate insult directed to me and others?

 

I don't know the answer to those questions, but we soon will, won't we?


Unlike white people, only black people eat food and drink water.  These facts certainly confirm that this bill is wildly racist.

 

Okay Mister, how about providing your next fact which also proves racism.

Originally posted by: Boilerman

Unlike white people, only black people eat food and drink water.  These facts certainly confirm that this bill is wildly racist.

 

Okay Mister, how about providing your next fact which also proves racism.


Boiler is babbling again. I feel sorry for him and his cognitive decline.

 

He asks Mister to "prove racism." What does that mean in English? To prove that it exists?

 

The poor man can't even articulate a coherent thought. I'm sure he used to have that ability, but now...dementia.

Originally posted by: MisterPicture

Candy, remember when you wrote, "Those of you who made "can't bring a drink of water" to voters in line an issue here are all falling for distortions of the truth...as usual?"

 

Well, thanks for the insult. I posted the actual text from the new law proving you wrong, and for some reason, you haven't responded.

 

So I have some questions:

Do you have the integrity to admit you were wrong?

Do you have the class to apologize for your gratuitous and inaccurate insult directed to me and others?

 

I don't know the answer to those questions, but we soon will, won't we?


MP, while Candy is a reasonable person, she appears to have bought into the RepubliQ narrative about "widespread voter fraud." And if you believe that fanciful story, then everyone who objects to voter suppression measures that are based on "preventing" that nonexistent fraud is "falling for distortions of the truth." Did Candy ever go on a date with Tucker Carlson? We expect this sort of nonsensical shit from Boiler or Tommie-poo (or the late, lamented David Miller), but I thought that Candy was "made of sterner stuff."

 

Here's the non-distorted truth. There are two ways to deal with voting rights:

1. Make it as easy as possible for people to vote.

2. Make it as difficult as possible for people to vote.

 

Now, think hard, everyone (even all you RepubliQs out there): which of the above two approaches is more in accordance with the principles of democracy?

 

MP - the law says one cannot solicit votes by handing out food & water. Thanks for losing your own argument. 

Little angry man has yet to show how the law makes it more difficult to vote. Even the Washington post gave Biden 4 Pinocchio's for Biden's comments. 

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now