I had a delightful conversation with a health Insurance company rep this morning

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
No one prevented couples from starting a small business (S, INC, LLC or Proprietorship) and securing group heath insurance in the past.
Imagine a law that gives a health insurance tax break to couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living. Just the everyday, mom and pop operation that buys and and sells nuclear power plants.

After a while, the government says, you know, there's really no reason for couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living to get a special health insurance tax break. We'll get rid of it and treat all couples the same, without regard to whether they buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living.

If that were to happen, the alanleroys would all be here to decry the unfairness of it all.
Just as Obamacare is getting rid of "job lock," the inability of unhappy employees to leave a job for fear of losing health insurance, it's also helping to eliminate "marriage lock."

Hope Mrs. alanleroy doesn't find out.
I must admit to have lost track. Did Chilcoot call Boilerman a liar, a bag of shit, or similar?


Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Well I believe I have finally solved this little mystery of why Nick's PPO Bronze 006 Plan from Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Illinois, for zip code 60103 for ages 54, 53 and 19 cost almost $850....and we don't even have to assume the Nick family are smokers who actually live in Chicago.
That definitely could explain a lot of the difference, if that's what's going on here.

However, it remains true that the Obamacare BCBS Bronze plan that we've posted here several times and that includes coverage for children up to age 26 is less expensive than what boilerman concedes is "comparable" coverage to Nick's old plan (in reality, likely far better coverage, but whatever) AND includes coverage for Nick's son, who now is no longer a minor.

Nick's old plan was a short-term major medical one. Among the things plans like these do to keep premiums low is:
* deny coverage to people with pre-existing conditions;
* not pay for preventative care;
* impose a lifetime cap on benefits;
* is not renewable; and
* allow the insurer to cancel at any time.

That last one was a real nightmare, because many of them were month-to-month policies w/ 30 day cancellation clauses. Get a cancer diagnosis on March 25, and if United Heath starts seeing oncologist bills before April 1, come May 1 you could be uninsured.

Obamacare policies like the BCBS Bronze ones do away with each of those limitations.

That's the larger point, that Nick can get better coverage for less money under Obamacare than he got last year from United Health.

And that the way boilerman presented Nick's situation here was fundamentally dishonest.


Forkie, please "cut and past" where I wrote that Nick and his family smoke. Folks, Forkie has lost his freaking mind.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Wow. What an interesting twist.

Since I've known Nick to be a "stand up guy" during the 51 years that we've been friends, I knew that he was not lying nor a "bag of shit". I couldn't prove it his numbers, but I was certain all along that Nick's numbers where accurate...
Wait, you're saying the guy complaining about the high cost of health insurance actually heads a family of THREE SMOKERS? You're kidding, right? That kind of gall is just hard to imagine.

And now he's with Blue Cross instead of a company that breathlessly advertises, "Monies are paid upon first diagnosis...medical treatment is not required! Benefits are yours to use on anything of your choice!" As in, "Honey, let's skip the chemo - we're going to Vegas!"

And since in a family of three smokers there's a decent chance of one of them will be puking up blood one of these days, Obamacare's no lifetime limit, no cancellation, and yearly open enrollment upgrade option will probably save him thousands - and maybe his life.



I've read some posts, and missed other posts. Why Chilcoot asking us to "Imagine a law that gives a health insurance tax break to couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living"?


Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
No one prevented couples from starting a small business (S, INC, LLC or Proprietorship) and securing group heath insurance in the past.
Imagine a law that gives a health insurance tax break to couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living. Just the everyday, mom and pop operation that buys and and sells nuclear power plants.

After a while, the government says, you know, there's really no reason for couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living to get a special health insurance tax break. We'll get rid of it and treat all couples the same, without regard to whether they buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living.

If that were to happen, the alanleroys would all be here to decry the unfairness of it all.


Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Forkie, please "cut and past" where I wrote that Nick and his family smoke...
Um because that's looks like the ONLY way Nick's rates could be anywhere near those quoted.

Right, alanleroy?
Forkie, it's quite apparent that Nick's quote was accurate and true. It's quite apparent that Boilerman never said that Nick and his family smoke. As Alanleroy accurately showed, Nick's plan and expenses were as I state.


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Forkie, please "cut and past" where I wrote that Nick and his family smoke...
Um because that's looks like the ONLY way Nick's rates could be anywhere near those quoted.

Right, alanleroy?


Again, I've lost track. Who all called Nick, Boilerman liars or a "bag of shit"..
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Forkie, please "cut and past" where I wrote that Nick and his family smoke...
Um because that's looks like the ONLY way Nick's rates could be anywhere near those quoted.

Right, alanleroy?

Not the Only way.



Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
No one prevented couples from starting a small business (S, INC, LLC or Proprietorship) and securing group heath insurance in the past.
Imagine a law that gives a health insurance tax break to couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living. Just the everyday, mom and pop operation that buys and and sells nuclear power plants.

After a while, the government says, you know, there's really no reason for couples who buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living to get a special health insurance tax break. We'll get rid of it and treat all couples the same, without regard to whether they buy and sell nuclear power plants for a living.

If that were to happen, the alanleroys would all be here to decry the unfairness of it all.

Why should a married couple who work as business partners be treated differently when it comes to health insurance than neighbors who work as business partners? They work the same hours. They pay the same employer taxes. They have the same risks and responsibilities. And President Obama promised "If you like you plan you can keep your plan". We liked our plan. If I get a divorce and move next door then it's all ok, eh Chillcoot? Do you have any idea how stupid that is? I honestly don't think you do.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now