ObamaCare NOT working as planned

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
There is no evidence because:

1. The IRS didn't keep back up paper emails (as called for by policy).

2. The IRS didn't keep their emails on the PC's.

3. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #1.

4. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #2.

5. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #3.

6. The IRS had the company archiving emails destroy them all.

If you believe all of those things were coincidence, you're nuts. It'll eventually be proven that this was a massive cover up, yet Liberals won't care.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
There is no evidence because:

1. The IRS didn't keep back up paper emails (as called for by policy).

2. The IRS didn't keep their emails on the PC's.

3. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #1.

4. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #2.

5. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #3.

6. The IRS had the company archiving emails destroy them all.

If you believe all of those things were coincidence, you're nuts. It'll eventually be proven that this was a massive cover up, yet Liberals won't care.

---

Ah...Obama is guilty because of information that Boilerman does not have and cant articulate. boom! Case closed.

The official investigation ended long before Darryl Issa's desperate fishing expedition for Lois Lerner's emails....but if thats what you are hanging your hat on you should realize that emails have a receiver as well as sender. If obama was getting incriminating emails from Lois Lerner there will be a record of them in his computer. But by the time that fact has dawned on the birthers they will have long surpassed this conspiracy and moved onto the next.

And in the meantime we should note how our resident conservatives are completely mum on the real IRS scandal of 2006

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: chefantwon
I wonder what you would be like if the IRS was targeting liberal groups instead of conservative ones?

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
There is no evidence because:

1. The IRS didn't keep back up paper emails (as called for by policy).

2. The IRS didn't keep their emails on the PC's.

3. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #1.

4. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #2.

5. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #3.

6. The IRS had the company archiving emails destroy them all.

If you believe all of those things were coincidence, you're nuts. It'll eventually be proven that this was a massive cover up, yet Liberals won't care.

---

Ah...Obama is guilty because of information that Boilerman does not have and cant articulate. boom! Case closed.

The official investigation ended long before Darryl Issa's desperate fishing expedition for Lois Lerner's emails....but if thats what you are hanging your hat on you should realize that emails have a receiver as well as sender. If obama was getting incriminating emails from Lois Lerner there will be a record of them in his computer. But by the time that fact has dawned on the birthers they will have long surpassed this conspiracy and moved onto the next.

And in the meantime we should note how our resident conservatives are completely mum on the real IRS scandal of 2006

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Those who deleted the evidence are put in charge of investigating itself, and PJ is comfortable with this? I've spoken with two IT guys regarding the disappeared emails, and both said that the only way all of the info could have disappeared with by systematic destruction. Then, while the investigations are proceeded, to have the archives destroyed at the 3rd party company?

It's obvious, PJ knows that there's a cover up and PJ doesn't care.

Quote

---

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
There is no evidence because:

1. The IRS didn't keep back up paper emails (as called for by policy).

2. The IRS didn't keep their emails on the PC's.

3. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #1.

4. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #2.

5. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #3.

6. The IRS had the company archiving emails destroy them all.

If you believe all of those things were coincidence, you're nuts. It'll eventually be proven that this was a massive cover up, yet Liberals won't care.

---

Ah...Obama is guilty because of information that Boilerman does not have and cant articulate. boom! Case closed.

The official investigation ended long before Darryl Issa's desperate fishing expedition for Lois Lerner's emails....but if thats what you are hanging your hat on you should realize that emails have a receiver as well as sender. If obama was getting incriminating emails from Lois Lerner there will be a record of them in his computer. But by the time that fact has dawned on the birthers they will have long surpassed this conspiracy and moved onto the next.

And in the meantime we should note how our resident conservatives are completely mum on the real IRS scandal of 2006

---

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
Those who deleted the evidence are put in charge of investigating itself, and PJ is comfortable with this? I've spoken with two IT guys regarding the disappeared emails, and both said that the only way all of the info could have disappeared with by systematic destruction. Then, while the investigations are proceeded, to have the archives destroyed at the 3rd party company?

It's obvious, PJ knows that there's a cover up and PJ doesn't care.

Quote

---

Originally posted by: pjstroh

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
There is no evidence because:

1. The IRS didn't keep back up paper emails (as called for by policy).

2. The IRS didn't keep their emails on the PC's.

3. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #1.

4. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #2.

5. The IRS didn't keep the emails on Server #3.

6. The IRS had the company archiving emails destroy them all.

If you believe all of those things were coincidence, you're nuts. It'll eventually be proven that this was a massive cover up, yet Liberals won't care.

---

Ah...Obama is guilty because of information that Boilerman does not have and cant articulate. boom! Case closed.

The official investigation ended long before Darryl Issa's desperate fishing expedition for Lois Lerner's emails....but if thats what you are hanging your hat on you should realize that emails have a receiver as well as sender. If obama was getting incriminating emails from Lois Lerner there will be a record of them in his computer. But by the time that fact has dawned on the birthers they will have long surpassed this conspiracy and moved onto the next.

And in the meantime we should note how our resident conservatives are completely mum on the real IRS scandal of 2006

---

---

do these IT guys work for the same company as your Buddy Pete? Im an IT guy, BTW...and email can be configured to archive in any one of a 100 ways so unless your buddies work for the IRS they are uninformed.

I care about facts and you dont have any. You played this same exact game with Bengazhi for 18 months swearing there was a cover up...and when all the facts manifested themselves you simply packed up and moved onto the next conspiracy. Here you are again swearing something illegal happened and Obama covered it up. And you cant say what it was.

There were facts and a full confession in 2006... But you didnt care then. You only care now even though you've got nothing to back up you accusation aside from sour grapes from the election.

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Boilerman
PJ, here's all that any objective person needs to know to know. The IRS and Obama, those being accused of guilt, investigated itself. The results of said investigation did not disclose crashed computers, they did not disclose missing emails, they did not disclosed that WHILE THE IRS WAS INVESTIGATING THE IRS, THE IRS TOLD THE COMPANY HIRED TO KEEP EMAIL DATA TO DESTROY ALL

---