"X" a/k/a The Harrah's Rincon million $$ drawings

Quote

Surely there are many well qualified employed and/or unemployed capable people in the immediate geographical area that would be eager for a lucrative job/career.

Unemployment is at an all time high.

There are many legitimate "job" sites on which a person can apply and/or company can recruit, as well as others such as Craigs List, etc.

Geez, here in S. Florida, just about every "lucrative" job posting has people lined up for hours just to submit a resume and hope for an interview.

Does anyone, did anyone at all, have any questions or issues why someone would seek employees, on an anonymous forum devoted to gambling and all things Las Vegas, for a job that has little or nothing to do with gambling, or Las Vegas?

Just curious.




You hit this one out of the stadium Roadtrip. Couldn't agree with you more.

Quote

Originally posted by: LurkerPoster
Quote

Surely there are many well qualified employed and/or unemployed capable people in the immediate geographical area that would be eager for a lucrative job/career.

Unemployment is at an all time high.

There are many legitimate "job" sites on which a person can apply and/or company can recruit, as well as others such as Craigs List, etc.

Geez, here in S. Florida, just about every "lucrative" job posting has people lined up for hours just to submit a resume and hope for an interview.

Does anyone, did anyone at all, have any questions or issues why someone would seek employees, on an anonymous forum devoted to gambling and all things Las Vegas, for a job that has little or nothing to do with gambling, or Las Vegas?

Just curious.




You hit this one out of the stadium Roadtrip. Couldn't agree with you more.


Not really, the subject matter can and does bounce all over the place, it is by no means limited to Vegas, hence the name free for all. Somehow the conversation sort of drifted into Alan mentioning some openings for a couple telemarketing gigs for his biz. We all know what he does so it all seemed in the correct realm of things.

Back to the ORIGINAL post and subject in this thread, are you all nuts thinking that was a traffic generating post IE spam? You gotta be crazy ro think he posted that to make any money on that. First off, IF, nobody had started all the crap over it, I doubt it would've created a couple dozen clicks which would've created what? a penny or two? But since this thread has probably produced a few extra clicks, what's the most it could have made? I'm pretty sure you get paid by like the thousands of clicks, so that's still completely neglible. Fedomalley chimed in on why he didn't think it was such an AP, that should'vr been the end of it, but nope, that didn't happen.

You guys nit pick and micro examine everything about MLA and I really don't understand the big hard on everyone has for him. Like I said, there's some people here wayyyy more annoying to pick on.
I thought Free For All meant no charge..free for all to post in that area of a Vegas board.
HP calls it "Vegas Free-For-All" for a (long forgotten) reason.

I always took "free for all" meaning talk freely amongst yourselves on whatever ya wanna talk about, kinda like kitchen sink on the paid side. For instance, there's a topic on less than absolute zero right I find really interesting, some may also, some may not, but it sure isn't vegas related, just a contribution by a forum member.

J

Edit to add one final thought and I should be done. The only time anyone has a problem with a thread, no matter how off topic, is if they don't like the author or don't like the subject, otherwise pretty much anything goes. Actually there's been some rather lively and humorous chatter about about some completely OT subjects. There's some very informative folks here who will help on matters like tech questions for their comoputers, or a good camera ..the list goes on. There's generally a good group of folks here with a few irratations aside, it's why I like to hang out here.

All JMO, JOHN
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
You guys nit pick and micro examine everything about MLA and I really don't understand the big hard on everyone has for him. Like I said, there's some people here wayyyy more annoying to pick on.


There may be people who are more annoying, but none as much fun as MLA to pick on and tease because he can be such as doofus at times.

For example, in this thread he comes up with a great play. When it is pointed out that it still falls a few percentage points below 100% he comes back with that doesn't matter as long as you're playing for high enough stakes. He has been taught, and actually believes, that you can make up for negative expectation games by betting more.

Sometimes it is better to laugh than to cry.
Quote

Originally posted by: KayPea
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
You guys nit pick and micro examine everything about MLA and I really don't understand the big hard on everyone has for him. Like I said, there's some people here wayyyy more annoying to pick on.


There may be people who are more annoying, but none as much fun as MLA to pick on and tease because he can be such as doofus at times.

For example, in this thread he comes up with a great play. When it is pointed out that it still falls a few percentage points below 100% he comes back with that doesn't matter as long as you're playing for high enough stakes. He has been taught, and actually believes, that you can make up for negative expectation games by betting more.

Sometimes it is better to laugh than to cry.


I'm breaking my own promise, because I was immediately emailed about this. What I said is that to the high rollers the small dollar loss probably won't matter. But I also pointed out, and none of you seem to acknowledge this, is that the high rollers get extra free play and extra promotions that can wipe out the small house edge of less than one-half of one percent (not a few percentage points but less than one-half of one percent) on the basic game, and that is even without winning any of the drawings. And I pointed out that with their high level of play they are also able to convert their comp points to free play which means that they will not have to use as much of their own money to play.

Plus, fed's figures on tier points for $50 for 1 point on certain machines is wrong, and I have no idea where he got it. He says VPfree but I play at Rincon and when I was there I asked about it. It certainly does not apply to the $100 single line machines. There are Dream Card machines that give you half-credit for play (there are no points for the "doubled bet" that Dream Card requires), but they took out the $5 Dream Card games and the max denomination now is $1 with 10 lines.

Before you call me a doofus make sure that my information is wrong. In this case it isn't.

With the free play, the added comp points that can be converted to free play, and by being devoted to playing on Tuesdays for triple-points and being there for all of the drawings, a high roller(s) can come close to having a positive return game (if not a definite positive return) and dominate the drawings.

And I'll give some more reasons for how the high rollers can pull this off but the other players can't. Who among us can be sure to play on Tuesdays? I can't -- I have work. Who among us can be sure to be there for every one of the Saturday drawings when $50,000 cash plus $50,000 free play is up grabs? I can't be sure I'll be there every Saturday. High Rollers can. And who can be sure to be there next New Year's Eve for the million dollar drawing? I can't.

Now, if you want to say that you judge the two-million dollar promotion at Rincon not to be a positive play, then fine. But if you had all the numbers (and hopefully you do now) you will see that if it isn't a positive play it comes real close.

But I wanted Bob Dancer to see it, that's why I posted it here. After all Bob calls playing slot machines at South Point facing a 4% edge some kind of advantage play, so something like what Rincon is offering should make him salivate.

This is a promotion that a high roller could figuratively "buy" by having a team that locks up the few $100 single line VP machines in the place, playing on Tuesdays, and making sure they are there the last Saturday of the month for the drawings.

If you don't see it that way, you don't, and you have every right to disagree. But don't call me a doofus, and don't claim that I posted here to drive traffic to my website. I bring in over a million Fing dollars a year, and the traffic that my site got from my post here wouldn't pay for a first class postage stamp -- and I can show you the report from Google Adsense and Google Analytics to prove it.

And why didn't I write it all here first? Because I put it on my own website first. Just as I put the story about Caesars changing the tier levels on my website first.

Argo....

Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
Quote

Originally posted by: KayPea
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
You guys nit pick and micro examine everything about MLA and I really don't understand the big hard on everyone has for him. Like I said, there's some people here wayyyy more annoying to pick on.


There may be people who are more annoying, but none as much fun as MLA to pick on and tease because he can be such as doofus at times.

For example, in this thread he comes up with a great play. When it is pointed out that it still falls a few percentage points below 100% he comes back with that doesn't matter as long as you're playing for high enough stakes. He has been taught, and actually believes, that you can make up for negative expectation games by betting more.

Sometimes it is better to laugh than to cry.


I'm breaking my own promise, because I was immediately emailed about this. What I said is that to the high rollers the small dollar loss probably won't matter. But I also pointed out, and none of you seem to acknowledge this, is that the high rollers get extra free play and extra promotions that can wipe out the small house edge of less than one-half of one percent (not a few percentage points but less than one-half of one percent) on the basic game, and that is even without winning any of the drawings. And I pointed out that with their high level of play they are also able to convert their comp points to free play which means that they will not have to use as much of their own money to play.

Plus, fed's figures on tier points for $50 for 1 point on certain machines is wrong, and I have no idea where he got it. He says VPfree but I play at Rincon and when I was there I asked about it. It certainly does not apply to the $100 single line machines. There are Dream Card machines that give you half-credit for play (there are no points for the "doubled bet" that Dream Card requires), but they took out the $5 Dream Card games and the max denomination now is $1 with 10 lines.

Before you call me a doofus make sure that my information is wrong. In this case it isn't.

With the free play, the added comp points that can be converted to free play, and by being devoted to playing on Tuesdays for triple-points and being there for all of the drawings, a high roller(s) can come close to having a positive return game (if not a definite positive return) and dominate the drawings.

And I'll give some more reasons for how the high rollers can pull this off but the other players can't. Who among us can be sure to play on Tuesdays? I can't -- I have work. Who among us can be sure to be there for every one of the Saturday drawings when $50,000 cash plus $50,000 free play is up grabs? I can't be sure I'll be there every Saturday. High Rollers can. And who can be sure to be there next New Year's Eve for the million dollar drawing? I can't.

Now, if you want to say that you judge the two-million dollar promotion at Rincon not to be a positive play, then fine. But if you had all the numbers (and hopefully you do now) you will see that if it isn't a positive play it comes real close.

But I wanted Bob Dancer to see it, that's why I posted it here. After all Bob calls playing slot machines at South Point facing a 4% edge some kind of advantage play, so something like what Rincon is offering should make him salivate.

This is a promotion that a high roller could figuratively "buy" by having a team that locks up the few $100 single line VP machines in the place, playing on Tuesdays, and making sure they are there the last Saturday of the month for the drawings.

If you don't see it that way, you don't, and you have every right to disagree. But don't call me a doofus, and don't claim that I posted here to drive traffic to my website. I bring in over a million Fing dollars a year, and the traffic that my site got from my post here wouldn't pay for a first class postage stamp -- and I can show you the report from Google Adsense and Google Analytics to prove it.

And why didn't I write it all here first? Because I put it on my own website first. Just as I put the story about Caesars changing the tier levels on my website first.

Argo....



I "quoted" this message in it's entirety so changes, or deletions, will not affect those coming late to the thread.

I may choose to respond to what he says. Or not.


I hope you do road trip. Pick it apart, line by line if you like. My facts are right.

But if you don't consider it an advantage play, than what is? That's what I'd like to know.
Quote

Originally posted by: MoneyLA
I hope you do road trip. Pick it apart, line by line if you like. My facts are right.

But if you don't consider it an advantage play, than what is? That's what I'd like to know.


An advantage play is one where the EV is positive. Where the player, not the house, has an advantage.

Facts? What facts? Where is the substantiated math to go with this "ultimate advantage play"?

A small dollar loss MAY not matter to a high roller, UNLESS that high roller is an advantage player. THAT high roller AP wants an EV that is positive, or that they (The high roller) perceive to be +EV. It is NOT an advantage play when the EV is negative.

IF the best games are –EV, than the only thing the hypothetical high roller is doing is “buying” drawing tickets, after traveling to Rincon on Tuesdays to play, than again on Saturday nights for the drawings. That would be 52 visits during 2013 to play and earn points on Tuesdays, and 12 Saturday trips for drawings of $50 K. With no guarantee of winning a drawing.

Fed explained where he got the $50 figure, but still used the smaller one in his analysis. If you want an idea of where he got it, look at VPFree. He stated that, yet you “have no idea where he got it” after remarking he is wrong. You go on to state you asked about it at Rincon when you were there.

MLA, you have a history of misspeaking, misquoting, omission, not understanding, and/or incomplete or inaccurate “research”. Many of your messages were/are like infomercials. Somehow, the “fine print” is missing or hidden.

You said, “But if you had all the numbers (and hopefully you do now) you will see that if it isn't a positive play it comes real close.” Allow me to reiterate. If it is not a positive EV play, it is not an advantage play. “Close” is not profit. And you still do not offer any math for those “ghost” comps the high rollers will get. Where did you provide “all the numbers”, or any substantiated numbers ? Just where is your math to prove your claims ?



Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now