Quote
Originally posted by: jillyfQuote
Originally posted by: Chilcoot
There's no First Amendment issue here with the Duck Dynasty Dope. Why are you even bringing up the First Amendment? It has nothing to do with anything here.
OK, you win. Magazine interviews, television broadcasts, and religious expression have nothing to do with the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Silly me.
Quote
Originally posted by: BobOrme I agree this isn't and wasn't a 1st Amendment issue. If he had been inclined to file suit, he had an actionable case of religious discrimination against A&E.
There I go again, thinking that the 14th Amendment and its progeny, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, are somehow related to the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Again, silly me.
We should just get rid of the damn thing, so us simple folk aren't always a gettin so confused.
What has government proposed to do against the Duck Dynasty Dope? Nothing, right?
So there's no need to reference the First Amendment. That law only limits the government. Robertson isn't limited by the First Amendment. Nor is A&E. Or the hordes of Americans who've chimed in with their thoughts.
No First Amendment issue here, and talking as if there is one is silly.