There you go conservatives: Obamacare is failing

Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
I count 16 times in this video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_o65vMUk5so&feature=player_detailpage
I count zero reference to Obamacare (ACA). So yeah, you're still not telling the truth.

obama said premiums would decline by $2,500, mine is up 21% over the last 2 years

As you can I wasn't referring to obamacare - I was referring to obama's own promises that he used to get elected
Well this is a pretty depressing article on how the price of Obamacare may go up even more. It's a piece on the actuary tables concerning policy rates increases for '15 and how the govt. may be on the hook if not enough younger, healthy folks sign up. I don't recall ever hearing the the fed govt. having to make up any difference if revenues fall short? At least that's how i read this paragraph from the article..

"hile the government has established certain risk protections to help offset the possibility of adverse selection for insurers for the first three years of Obamacare, without younger, healthier people in the insurance pool, the actuaries say federal officials could be on the hook for larger-than-expected payments under the risk program. And the ripple effects would likely continue beyond next year. "

https://www.cnbc.com/id/101180198

EDIT to add; After rereading I suppose it means the fed will have to pay an even larger portion of subsidy's? I would hate to think it would be a direct cash payment in lieu of a profit.
I do think this is what will happen. Like I said before the real shock is going to be a year from now when the 2015 premiums are announced. The 2014 premiums are based upon projections from models of who the government and the insurance companies thought would likely enroll. They were counting on a lot of young healthy folks. From what has leaked out so far it looks like older sick folks have been the ones enrolling at a higher rate than expected and young healthy folks are enrolling at a lower rate than expected. That means overall premiums will shoot way up in 2015 as will the cost of the share of premiums the government pays through the subsides. That is what they mean by on the hook.
It all seemd very predictable to me. Obama was way too optimistic on the number of younger folks that would find the insurance appealing. The co-pays and deductibles of these policies are just too high to be attractive to younger folks just starting out in adult life.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Well this is a pretty depressing article on how the price of Obamacare may go up even more. It's a piece on the actuary tables concerning policy rates increases for '15 and how the govt. may be on the hook if not enough younger, healthy folks sign up. I don't recall ever hearing the the fed govt. having to make up any difference if revenues fall short? At least that's how i read this paragraph from the article..

"hile the government has established certain risk protections to help offset the possibility of adverse selection for insurers for the first three years of Obamacare, without younger, healthier people in the insurance pool, the actuaries say federal officials could be on the hook for larger-than-expected payments under the risk program. And the ripple effects would likely continue beyond next year. "

https://www.cnbc.com/id/101180198

EDIT to add; After rereading I suppose it means the fed will have to pay an even larger portion of subsidy's? I would hate to think it would be a direct cash payment in lieu of a profit.



this is the "law of the land" that you are entitled to health care! What a bunch of bull*hit! We need to stop this before it "grows" anymore! Obama had no and I mean no idea how this was going to "rollout" and accepted by young insurers (who by the way want nothing to do with it)

You can call the tea party what ever you wish but one thing they are correct on, Obamacare, it is another government program that WE can not afford. He is backtracking more than the french army!
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
I do think this is what will happen. Like I said before the real shock is going to be a year from now when the 2015 premiums are announced. The 2014 premiums are based upon projections from models of who the government and the insurance companies thought would likely enroll. They were counting on a lot of young healthy folks. From what has leaked out so far it looks like older sick folks have been the ones enrolling at a higher rate than expected and young healthy folks are enrolling at a lower rate than expected. That means overall premiums will shoot way up in 2015 as will the cost of the share of premiums the government pays through the subsides. That is what they mean by on the hook.
It all seemd very predictable to me. Obama was way too optimistic on the number of younger folks that would find the insurance appealing. The co-pays and deductibles of these policies are just too high to be attractive to younger folks just starting out in adult life.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Well this is a pretty depressing article on how the price of Obamacare may go up even more. It's a piece on the actuary tables concerning policy rates increases for '15 and how the govt. may be on the hook if not enough younger, healthy folks sign up. I don't recall ever hearing the the fed govt. having to make up any difference if revenues fall short? At least that's how i read this paragraph from the article..

"hile the government has established certain risk protections to help offset the possibility of adverse selection for insurers for the first three years of Obamacare, without younger, healthier people in the insurance pool, the actuaries say federal officials could be on the hook for larger-than-expected payments under the risk program. And the ripple effects would likely continue beyond next year. "

https://www.cnbc.com/id/101180198

EDIT to add; After rereading I suppose it means the fed will have to pay an even larger portion of subsidy's? I would hate to think it would be a direct cash payment in lieu of a profit.



Young people in massachusetts disagree....for about 6 years now
We shall see. So far it hasn't went well, and I don't think that is stretching the truth to say so.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
I do think this is what will happen. Like I said before the real shock is going to be a year from now when the 2015 premiums are announced. The 2014 premiums are based upon projections from models of who the government and the insurance companies thought would likely enroll. They were counting on a lot of young healthy folks. From what has leaked out so far it looks like older sick folks have been the ones enrolling at a higher rate than expected and young healthy folks are enrolling at a lower rate than expected. That means overall premiums will shoot way up in 2015 as will the cost of the share of premiums the government pays through the subsides. That is what they mean by on the hook.
It all seemd very predictable to me. Obama was way too optimistic on the number of younger folks that would find the insurance appealing. The co-pays and deductibles of these policies are just too high to be attractive to younger folks just starting out in adult life.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Well this is a pretty depressing article on how the price of Obamacare may go up even more. It's a piece on the actuary tables concerning policy rates increases for '15 and how the govt. may be on the hook if not enough younger, healthy folks sign up. I don't recall ever hearing the the fed govt. having to make up any difference if revenues fall short? At least that's how i read this paragraph from the article..

"hile the government has established certain risk protections to help offset the possibility of adverse selection for insurers for the first three years of Obamacare, without younger, healthier people in the insurance pool, the actuaries say federal officials could be on the hook for larger-than-expected payments under the risk program. And the ripple effects would likely continue beyond next year. "

https://www.cnbc.com/id/101180198

EDIT to add; After rereading I suppose it means the fed will have to pay an even larger portion of subsidy's? I would hate to think it would be a direct cash payment in lieu of a profit.



Young people in massachusetts disagree....for about 6 years now


Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
We shall see. So far it hasn't went well, and I don't think that is stretching the truth to say so.

Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
I do think this is what will happen. Like I said before the real shock is going to be a year from now when the 2015 premiums are announced. The 2014 premiums are based upon projections from models of who the government and the insurance companies thought would likely enroll. They were counting on a lot of young healthy folks. From what has leaked out so far it looks like older sick folks have been the ones enrolling at a higher rate than expected and young healthy folks are enrolling at a lower rate than expected. That means overall premiums will shoot way up in 2015 as will the cost of the share of premiums the government pays through the subsides. That is what they mean by on the hook.
It all seemd very predictable to me. Obama was way too optimistic on the number of younger folks that would find the insurance appealing. The co-pays and deductibles of these policies are just too high to be attractive to younger folks just starting out in adult life.


Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Well this is a pretty depressing article on how the price of Obamacare may go up even more. It's a piece on the actuary tables concerning policy rates increases for '15 and how the govt. may be on the hook if not enough younger, healthy folks sign up. I don't recall ever hearing the the fed govt. having to make up any difference if revenues fall short? At least that's how i read this paragraph from the article..

"hile the government has established certain risk protections to help offset the possibility of adverse selection for insurers for the first three years of Obamacare, without younger, healthier people in the insurance pool, the actuaries say federal officials could be on the hook for larger-than-expected payments under the risk program. And the ripple effects would likely continue beyond next year. "

https://www.cnbc.com/id/101180198

EDIT to add; After rereading I suppose it means the fed will have to pay an even larger portion of subsidy's? I would hate to think it would be a direct cash payment in lieu of a profit.



Young people in massachusetts disagree....for about 6 years now

Romneycare enrollments in its very first month: 123. It hadn't gone well, and I don't think that is stretching the truth to say so.
Everything is OK now, 38 days after this fiasco launched, our President said he was sorry......

I feel so much better now - heck I'm seeing rainbows
"Romneycare enrollments in its very first month: 123. It hadn't gone well, and I don't think that is stretching the truth to say so"

Yes, we know we know, you've mentioned for about the tenth time at least. Say something once and post when you have something new to add.

J
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now