Quote
Originally posted by: Campion
It says right in the subtitle of the article that "Once considered a leader, Oregon's insurance exchange still hasn't enrolled anyone"
THEY are stating that. Not me.
Originally posted by: Campion
It says right in the subtitle of the article that "Once considered a leader, Oregon's insurance exchange still hasn't enrolled anyone"
THEY are stating that. Not me.
Quote
Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Here's what Campion wrote about Oregon:QuoteAnd Campion's right.
Originally posted by: Campion
Seems that my home state is still stuck at ZERO sign-ups.
If you ignore the 88,000 who've signed up, according to the story Campion posted but did not read. Apparently they don't count, somehow.
A friendly note to Campion:
Headlines are brief. They don't tell the whole story. That's why the print all those other words below the headline and subhead. You know, the actual story
In Oregon, some 88,000 people have signed up for insurance offered through Obamacare. Not "ZERO", as you claimed. How do I know this? Well, I read a newspaper story you posted, that's how.
Sure, none of them went through the state's terrible website. But they did sign up. Which you would have known if you had a "read newspaper article before posting it" policy.
Headlines are brief. They don't tell the whole story. That's why the print all those other words below the headline and subhead. You know, the actual story
In Oregon, some 88,000 people have signed up for insurance offered through Obamacare. Not "ZERO", as you claimed. How do I know this? Well, I read a newspaper story you posted, that's how.
Sure, none of them went through the state's terrible website. But they did sign up. Which you would have known if you had a "read newspaper article before posting it" policy.