There you go conservatives: Obamacare is failing

The primary problem with your argument is that you assume the insurance will be there when you get sick. Unless your independently wealthy it won't last for long. You have to be able to continue to pay the premiums even though you're no longer working because of your illness or injury. In addition to just paying the premiums you have to be able to fund your co-pays, your co-insurance and your deductible. Then you also have to fund out of network, experimental treatment and costs of treatments the insurance companies finds to be unreasonable. This is how the old system works and this is how Obamacare works. If you suffer a catastrophic injury or chronic illness the system is designed to get you to consume your assets as quickly as possible and get you off the for profit insurance companies rolls. You end up broke, sick and on Medicaid.


Quote

Originally posted by: Chilcoot
Quote

Originally posted by: Tutontow
Chilly to clarify my point, you were trying to show how Bob more than likely would go broke if he had a major illness, I was just trying to show that in todays world your bills can go well beyond 100 or 200K. Jatki is a prime example of a responsible person who paid for insurance and more than likely is damn glad he did.
Yes, totally agree. And it's a point we can't make often enough.

It's all well and good to have a healthy fantasy life and think that we're immune from the reality of the human condition. Perhaps we believe we are a cowboy out riding the range, or a pirate looking for buried treasure, or the pilot of a spaceship. All great fantasies.

But in our waking moments, we should realize that we're made of flesh and blood, and that our bodies are not immune to disease or damage. And some kinds of disease and damage are very expensive to heal, often beyond our means to afford. And so, if we can, we get health insurance, and make sure it's good enough to cover us.

Now maybe BobOrme is fabulously wealthy and can afford the best of care without insurance. I doubt it, he's described himself as a former stock car pit crewmember and a former pool hall manager. All fine occupations, but not the sorts of things that typically lead to great wealth.

But maybe he is crazy rich. Is it really too much to require him to also buy insurance, insurance that (1) will pay for his own care if need be, and (2) contribute towards the care of others.

Sure, maybe he'll live to 100 and never get a cough. But wouldn't he want to be part of a system that can do so much good for the less fortunate, and will replace a health care system that's truly one of the worst in the developed world? Cubans justifiably laugh at our outgoing health care system. Cubans!

Well, apparently for BobOrme, it is too much to ask. Sad, really. Hope you never get sick, Bob, be well.


Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
The primary problem with your argument is that you assume the insurance will be there when you get sick. Unless your independently wealthy it won't last for long. You have to be able to continue to pay the premiums even though you're no longer working because of your illness or injury. In addition to just paying the premiums you have to be able to fund your co-pays, your co-insurance and your deductible. Then you also have to fund out of network, experimental treatment and costs of treatments the insurance companies finds to be unreasonable. This is how the old system works and this is how Obamacare works. If you suffer a catastrophic injury or chronic illness the system is designed to get you to consume your assets as quickly as possible and get you off the for profit insurance companies rolls. You end up broke, sick and on Medicaid.



You make excellent points. But here is the problem...you are comparing Obamacare to something that might be better than Obamacare. That is a debate worth having. That is a conversation that an intelligent government would have.

But thats not the debate in Washington...and not the debate you really find on this board. We're stuck with thew debate between Obamacare and the train wreck system that preceded it. Does Obamacare solve all problems? No. It needs to be improved...dramatically. If Republicans had two functioning brain cells among them they would attack Obamacare where it falls short instead of trying to convince the public the system we had before was better.

In the context of the debate as it exists, I'm going to say:
- opening access to insurance for 30 million people is better.
- Not allowing insurance companies to discriminate against sick people is better.
- Filling the donut hole on prescription drugs for seniors is better.
- Letting grad students stay on their parents medical plan is better.
- Publishing Prices for care givers so consumers can make informed decisions is better.
- Forcing insurance companies to pay for care instead of private jets is better.

I'm genuinely curious, malibber. Strictly given the choice between the ACA and the status quo before it...would you want to go back?







"But thats not the debate in Washington...and not the debate you really find on this board. We're stuck with thew debate between Obamacare and the train wreck system that preceded it"

Prior to obamcare 85% of the people had insurance and over 65% were satisfied with their coverage, I don't see a train wreck

I'm genuinely curious, malibber. Strictly given the choice between the ACA and the status quo before it...would you want to go back?

The tradeoff has been absolute chaos to 16% of the economy
"Cubans justifiably laugh at our outgoing health care system."

But yet they will get on makeshift rafts to come here

If someone is wealthy, lets say net worth over 10 million dollars, are they required to buy auto insurance? I'm just curious because if the answer is no why can't they be self insured?
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Cubans justifiably laugh at our outgoing health care system."

But yet they will get on makeshift rafts to come here
Excellent point.

Even in a nation as god awful as Cuba, and it's definitely god awful, they've managed to develop a healthcare system that has outperforms ours in significant ways. Well put.
Quote

Originally posted by: Tutontow
If someone is wealthy, lets say net worth over 10 million dollars, are they required to buy auto insurance? I'm just curious because if the answer is no why can't they be self insured?
There are a few states that allow people to self-insure their auto coverage. Apparently California, Tennessee, Washington, Texas and Ohio drivers can drive without insurance.

California requires drivers to have liability insurance, with a minimum of $15,000 in coverage for the injury or death of one person, $30,000 for more than one person, and $5,000 for property damage. In lieu of that, a California driver who doesn't want to buy car insurance can make a $35,000 cash deposit with the California Department of Motor Vehicles, post a surety bond for $35,000 or get a self-insurance certificate from the DMV.

Link
Quote

Originally posted by: pjstroh
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
The primary problem with your argument is that you assume the insurance will be there when you get sick. Unless your independently wealthy it won't last for long. You have to be able to continue to pay the premiums even though you're no longer working because of your illness or injury. In addition to just paying the premiums you have to be able to fund your co-pays, your co-insurance and your deductible. Then you also have to fund out of network, experimental treatment and costs of treatments the insurance companies finds to be unreasonable. This is how the old system works and this is how Obamacare works. If you suffer a catastrophic injury or chronic illness the system is designed to get you to consume your assets as quickly as possible and get you off the for profit insurance companies rolls. You end up broke, sick and on Medicaid.



You make excellent points. But here is the problem...you are comparing Obamacare to something that might be better than Obamacare. That is a debate worth having. That is a conversation that an intelligent government would have.

But thats not the debate in Washington...and not the debate you really find on this board. We're stuck with thew debate between Obamacare and the train wreck system that preceded it. Does Obamacare solve all problems? No. It needs to be improved...dramatically. If Republicans had two functioning brain cells among them they would attack Obamacare where it falls short instead of trying to convince the public the system we had before was better.

In the context of the debate as it exists, I'm going to say:
- opening access to insurance for 30 million people is better.
- Not allowing insurance companies to discriminate against sick people is better.
- Filling the donut hole on prescription drugs for seniors is better.
- Letting grad students stay on their parents medical plan is better.
- Publishing Prices for care givers so consumers can make informed decisions is better.
- Forcing insurance companies to pay for care instead of private jets is better.

I'm genuinely curious, malibber. Strictly given the choice between the ACA and the status quo before it...would you want to go back?


I'll agree there's a few points that I think are good in the ACA, but as a whole it's a trainwreck and I would like to see some improvements if'n we are going to live with it.


One thing Mal said that made me think,
"If you suffer a catastrophic injury or chronic illness the system is designed to get you to consume your assets as quickly as possible and get you off the for profit insurance companies rolls. You end up broke, sick and on Medicaid. "

about my life ins. policy. Come to find out there's a clause in the policy I bought that pays my premiums for life if need be, a catastrophic injury clause if you will. I wasn't even aware it was in there, I just got lucky I had picked a pretty good policy from my agent.
I know ins. co.s would never do this for healthcare policys, but it would be a pretty good provision.

J
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
In related news, . . . on 18 November 2013 President Obama told supporters on a conference call: “In the first month alone we’ve seen more than 100 million Americans successfully enroll in the new insurance plans.”

Uh, . . . OH! DonDiego thinks he might be detecting delusions of grandeur in America's current President.

" . . . the president got on the conference call to enlist his legions of grass-roots activists to help herd Americans onto the ObamaCare rolls.
The call was set up by Organizing for Action [formerly: Obama for America], his political campaign that now promotes his presidential agenda."
Ref: The New York Post


LOL I herad that on the radio driving home. He was talking about "reminding all your friends and family over the holidays, all your friends at church, school ,everywhere, to make sure and sign up in the exchanges.. YEA! start bringing up Obamacare at the dinner table over thanksgiving, better hope everyone 's in agreement or else it's could make for some testy holidays

J
Quote

Originally posted by: jatki99
Quote

Originally posted by: DonDiego
In related news, . . . on 18 November 2013 President Obama told supporters on a conference call: “In the first month alone we’ve seen more than 100 million Americans successfully enroll in the new insurance plans.”

Uh, . . . OH! DonDiego thinks he might be detecting delusions of grandeur in America's current President.

" . . . the president got on the conference call to enlist his legions of grass-roots activists to help herd Americans onto the ObamaCare rolls.
The call was set up by Organizing for Action [formerly: Obama for America], his political campaign that now promotes his presidential agenda."
Ref: The New York Post


LOL I herad that on the radio driving home. He was talking about "reminding all your friends and family over the holidays, all your friends at church, school ,everywhere, to make sure and sign up in the exchanges.. YEA! start bringing up Obamacare at the dinner table over thanksgiving, better hope everyone 's in agreement or else it's could make for some testy holidays

J


When you here this kind of stuff it reminds you of just how out of touch Washington is with main stream America. Can you imagine walking up to your friends and neighbors and reminding them to sign up. Around my neighborhood I had better make sure the ACA covers my dental work if I bring up anything Obama related.

Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now