Quote
Originally posted by: malibber2
But part of the whole promise of Obamacare was that you would get coverage for preexisting conditions. So now we tell an MS patient is the good news we are going to give you coverage, but the bad news is your still going to have to pay $1,980 a month out of pocket. And it is not just low end plans if you actually read the article it talks about how it doesn't matter if you're on a Bronze or a Gold plan your still going to have to pay $6,350 or $12,700 per-year out of pocket depending on if you have single or family coverage and that is if you lucky enough that your drugs are on the approved list. If you're not on the approved list you pay 100% out of pocket. The article mentions several cancer treating drugs that are simply not covered at all, and in those cases it wouldn't matter if they brought the bronze plan or platinum plan the drugs wouldn't be covered under the high end or low end plans.
Originally posted by: malibber2
But part of the whole promise of Obamacare was that you would get coverage for preexisting conditions. So now we tell an MS patient is the good news we are going to give you coverage, but the bad news is your still going to have to pay $1,980 a month out of pocket. And it is not just low end plans if you actually read the article it talks about how it doesn't matter if you're on a Bronze or a Gold plan your still going to have to pay $6,350 or $12,700 per-year out of pocket depending on if you have single or family coverage and that is if you lucky enough that your drugs are on the approved list. If you're not on the approved list you pay 100% out of pocket. The article mentions several cancer treating drugs that are simply not covered at all, and in those cases it wouldn't matter if they brought the bronze plan or platinum plan the drugs wouldn't be covered under the high end or low end plans.
Its a legitimate fault but it is not one that was caused by Obamacare. The Forbes article you cite blames Obamacare for a scenario that existed both before and after its implementation. That is fundamentally dishonest of them, dont ya think?
If you want to argue the new law does not go far enough then I'm right there with ya. But lets be honest about what causes problems and what doesn't