Corporations now have religious freedom

Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Hobby Lobby would still have to make the other 16 birth control options available"

They already agreed to make the other forms available. They objected to the abortion type drugs...
So what? What if the next corporation objected to all twenty - for religious reasons. Or vaccinations, or blood transfusions, or anti-depressants - for religious reasons.

Would ALL of these religious objections be legitimate. Or are certain religions more equal than others?


In the majority opinion written by Justice Alito, he specifies that the ruling applies only to the contraceptive mandate...
So he's saying that certain religious beliefs are more equal than other beliefs. I guess Christianist beliefs trump 7th Day Adventist beliefs for Alito. And you agree with that?

Does anyone here agree with that?
This ruling hinges on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was passed in 1993 to redress an earlier court ruling against Native Americans who’d used the hallucinogen peyote as part of a religious ceremony.

Ironically, that Supreme Court ruling was written by Justice Antonin Scalia, while the RFRA passed in response was supported by Sen. Harry Reid and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
The law’s purpose was to give broader protections to religious freedom.

If the government wants to impose a rule that substantially burdens an American’s free exercise of religion, the law says, it not only has to have a compelling interest, it has to use the least-restrictive means possible.

By contrast, the president seems to make a habit of forcing people to pay for his preferences.
In this case, he threatened to crush anyone who objected with huge fines — running to $475 million a year for Hobby Lobby alone. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito observed that if these fines “do not amount to a substantial burden, it’s hard to see what would.”
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
This ruling hinges on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which was passed in 1993 to redress an earlier court ruling against Native Americans who’d used the hallucinogen peyote as part of a religious ceremony.

Ironically, that Supreme Court ruling was written by Justice Antonin Scalia, while the RFRA passed in response was supported by Sen. Harry Reid and signed into law by President Bill Clinton.
The law’s purpose was to give broader protections to religious freedom.

If the government wants to impose a rule that substantially burdens an American’s free exercise of religion, the law says, it not only has to have a compelling interest, it has to use the least-restrictive means possible.

By contrast, the president seems to make a habit of forcing people to pay for his preferences.
In this case, he threatened to crush anyone who objected with huge fines — running to $475 million a year for Hobby Lobby alone. Writing for the majority, Justice Samuel Alito observed that if these fines “do not amount to a substantial burden, it’s hard to see what would.”


Yet again, hoops2 cuts and pastes from a copyrighted article and pretends he was the one who wrote its properly-spelled, grammatically-correct words.

This time he's just copying an editorial from today's New York Post, one of the mouths on Rupert Murdoch's right wing noise machine.







Why should hoops2 think for himself when Rupert Murdoch will do it for him? Stay classy, hoops2.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Hobby Lobby would still have to make the other 16 birth control options available"

They already agreed to make the other forms available. They objected to the abortion type drugs...
So what? What if the next corporation objected to all twenty - for religious reasons. Or vaccinations, or blood transfusions, or anti-depressants - for religious reasons.

Would ALL of these religious objections be legitimate. Or are certain religions more equal than others?


In the majority opinion written by Justice Alito, he specifies that the ruling applies only to the contraceptive mandate...
So he's saying that certain religious beliefs are more equal than other beliefs. I guess Christianist beliefs trump 7th Day Adventist beliefs for Alito. And you agree with that?

Does anyone here agree with that?

I didn't say I agree or disagree with this decision. All I'm sayin' is your specific 'what if' regarding "Vaccinations" and "Blood Transfusions" was directly addressed as a non starter as part of the majority opinion. So basically I was just pointing out your error. Carry on.


If I held the belief that I should be allowed to kill Liberals because of non-religious beliefs, does Forkie believe that these beliefs carry more or less weight than religious beliefs?


Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Hobby Lobby would still have to make the other 16 birth control options available"

They already agreed to make the other forms available. They objected to the abortion type drugs...
So what? What if the next corporation objected to all twenty - for religious reasons. Or vaccinations, or blood transfusions, or anti-depressants - for religious reasons.

Would ALL of these religious objections be legitimate. Or are certain religions more equal than others?


In the majority opinion written by Justice Alito, he specifies that the ruling applies only to the contraceptive mandate...
So he's saying that certain religious beliefs are more equal than other beliefs. I guess Christianist beliefs trump 7th Day Adventist beliefs for Alito. And you agree with that?

Does anyone here agree with that?


Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Hobby Lobby would still have to make the other 16 birth control options available"

They already agreed to make the other forms available. They objected to the abortion type drugs...
So what? What if the next corporation objected to all twenty - for religious reasons. Or vaccinations, or blood transfusions, or anti-depressants - for religious reasons.

Would ALL of these religious objections be legitimate. Or are certain religions more equal than others?


In the majority opinion written by Justice Alito, he specifies that the ruling applies only to the contraceptive mandate...
So he's saying that certain religious beliefs are more equal than other beliefs. I guess Christianist beliefs trump 7th Day Adventist beliefs for Alito. And you agree with that?

Does anyone here agree with that?

I didn't say I agree or disagree with this decision. All I'm sayin' is your specific 'what if' regarding "Vaccinations" and "Blood Transfusions" was directly addressed as a non starter as part of the majority opinion. So basically I was just pointing out your error. Carry on.


You miss forkie's point. I agree with his sentiment. I work with a Jehovah Witness. They don't believe in blood transfusions any more than these Hobby Lobby folks believe in contraception.

Is the issue that Hobby Lobby's religion is more mainstream than JH or is it that contraception is less medically required than blood transfusions.
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: chefantwon
Quote

Originally posted by: malibber2
At least according to the conservative majority on the Supreme court. The very predictable outcome is many corporations will now find "religion" to avoid complying with all sorts of Federal Laws.

Minimum Wage and overtime laws are among the first I suspect that will be challenged as an infringement of these new found corporate religious rights.

This is probably one of the worst decisions handed down in modern times. How to determine what is a legitimate religious belief of an intangible non-living thing is beyond me.


Gee, like you really think this will happen? Last I heard 6 people or less have to own the company....Kinda makes that real hard to do now eh???
How about Cargill, Koch Industries and Dell. That's about 300,000 Americans employed right there.

And in 2009, a majority of American employees worked for closely held corporations.

But you know, Chef, you've been so good at ignoring actual data in the past, why don't you ignore this bit too. Just keep on ignorantly claiming that closely held corporations are really rare. That way you'll stay consistent.


On September 12, 2013, Dell stockholders approved the proposal in which Michael Dell, Dell’s Founder, Chairman and CEO, will acquire Dell in partnership with global technology investment firm Silver Lake Partners. The merger transaction closed on October 29, 2013, and the company has commenced the process to delist its common shares from the NASDAQ Stock Market. Per the merger agreement, Dell shareholders are entitled to receive $13.75 in cash, in addition to a special dividend of $0.13 per common share.


NAME

TITLE

LOCATION

STRATEGY



Joerg Adams

Director

Menlo Park

Partners








Raj Atluru

Managing Director

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Jason Babcoke

Principal

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Neil Barua

Operating Partner

New York

Value Creation








Mark Beith

Principal

London

Partners








Mike Bingle

Managing Partner and Managing Director

New York

Partners








Ryan Bone

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








John Brennan

Managing Director

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Susannah Carrier

Managing Director and Head of Marketing and Investor Relations

New York

Silver Lake Group








Jimmy Chang

Director

Hong Kong

Partners








Eric Chen

Managing Director

Hong Kong, Shanghai

Partners








Sureel Choksi

Operating Executive

Menlo Park

Value Creation








Hugo Chong

Research Analyst

Hong Kong

Partners








Thomas Conneely

Vice President of Operations - Silver Lake Waterman

Menlo Park

Silver Lake Group








Brian Crews

Director

Menlo Park

Waterman








Kenny Cui

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Jim Davidson

Co-Founder, Managing Partner and Managing Director

Menlo Park

Partners








Sean Delehanty

Director

New York

Partners








Sahil W. Desai

Senior Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer

Menlo Park

Silver Lake Group








Sebastian Duesterhoeft

Associate

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Egon Durban

Managing Partner and Managing Director

Menlo Park

Partners











Jonathan Durham

Principal

New York

Partners








Stephen Evans

Director

Menlo Park

Partners








Martin Fichtner

Managing Director

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








John Flynn

Principal

London

Partners








Pierre Gatta

Operating Executive

New York

Value Creation








Mark Gillett

Managing Director and Head of Value Creation

London

Value Creation














Jon Goldberg

Vice President and Controller - Management Entities

Cupertino

Silver Lake Group








Gordon Goldstein

Managing Director - Head of External Affairs

New York

Silver Lake Group












Ajei Gopal

Operating Partner

New York

Value Creation








Craig Griffin

Operating Executive

Menlo Park

Value Creation








Adam Grosser

Group Head and Managing Director

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Kevin Guan

Associate

Hong Kong

Partners








Sören Haefcke

Analyst

London

Partners








Mark Haller

Associate

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Sam Halls

Associate

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Jordan Halpern-Leistner

Associate

New York

Partners








Kenneth Hao

Managing Partner and Managing Director

Menlo Park and Hong Kong

Partners








Hollie Moore Haynes

Managing Director

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Dan Hoevel

Associate - Marketing and Investor Relations

New York

Silver Lake Group








Nicole Hook

Manager - Human Resources

New York

Silver Lake Group








Glenn Hutchins

Co-Founder

New York

Partners












Angela Jiang

Senior Vice President - Finance

Cupertino

Silver Lake Group








Eric Johnson

Director

Menlo Park

Partners








Caimin Jones

Operating Executive

London

Value Creation








Yolande Jun

Director- Finance

Cupertino

Silver Lake Group








Juhana Kaikkonen

Analyst

London

Partners








Adam Karol

Director

New York

Partners








Sean Kendra

Associate

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Chris Kennelly

Principal

Menlo Park

Waterman








Rex Khan

Senior Counsel

Menlo Park

Silver Lake Group








Joon Kim

Analyst

Menlo Park

Waterman








Jeff Kimbell

Operating Executive

Menlo Park

Value Creation












Karen King

Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer

Menlo Park

Silver Lake Group








Georg Knoflach

Associate

London

Partners








Michael Korzinstone

Principal

New York

Partners








Arif Lakhani

Principal

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Bryce Lee

Managing Director

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Catherine Lee

Associate

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Scott Lefever

Associate

New York

Partners








Yingqi Li

Principal

Hong Kong

Partners








Alexandre Lim

Associate

London

Partners








Sean Liu

Associate

Hong Kong

Partners








Christian Lucas

Managing Director

London

Partners








Paola Maleh

Head of EMEA Marketing and Investor Relations

London

Silver Lake Group








Mark Margiotta

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Paul Mercadante

Managing Director

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Sanjeet Mitra

Principal

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Greg Mondre

Managing Partner and Managing Director

New York

Partners








Katie Morin

Manager - Human Resources

Menlo Park

Silver Lake Group








Tezira Nabongo

Vice President - Talent Management

Menlo Park

Value Creation








Serene Nah

Senior Operating Executive

Hong Kong

Value Creation








Sebastian Neelamkavil

Principal

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Joel Newbert

Associate

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Karol Niewiadomski

Principal

London

Partners








Janice Oh

Associate, Finance & Investor Administration

Cupertino

Silver Lake Group








Geoff Oltmans

Managing Director and Head of Capital Markets

Menlo Park

Partners








Shawn O'Neill

Managing Director and Co-Group Head of Waterman

Menlo Park

Waterman








Joe Osnoss

Managing Director

London

Partners








Ulf Pagenkopf

Associate

London

Partners








Jason Paige

Vice President and Director of Information Technology

Menlo Park

Silver Lake Group








Kyle Paster

Senior Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Audra Paterna

Director - Human Resources

New York

Silver Lake Group








Simon Patterson

Managing Director

London

Partners








Jacqueline Petts

Head of Legal - Asia

Hong Kong

Silver Lake Group








Lindsey Press

Vice President - Marketing and Investor Relations

New York

Silver Lake Group








Ishan Puri

Analyst

Menlo Park

Waterman








Josh Raffaelli

Managing Director

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Ramzi Rafih

Associate

London

Partners








Randy Randleman

Director

Menlo Park

Sumeru








David Roux

Co-Founder and Senior Director


Partners








Kyle Ryland

Managing Director

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Andy Schader

Managing Director and General Counsel of Silver Lake Partners

New York

Silver Lake Group








Jeff Schneble

Associate

Menlo Park

Value Creation








Jason Schneider

Analyst

New York

Partners








Gautam Shah

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Ajay Shah

Sumeru Founding Managing Partner

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Simon Shen

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Meicheng Shi

Associate

New York

Partners








Baker Shogry

Associate

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Rick Stubblefield

Managing Director and Co-Group Head of Waterman

Menlo Park

Waterman








Germaine Sze

Head of Asia-Pacific Marketing and Investor Relations

Hong Kong

Silver Lake Group








Yuichiro Takezaki

Senior Associate

Tokyo

Partners








George Tee

Operating Executive

Hong Kong

Value Creation








Tom Vacek

Associate

New York

Partners








Pranav Verma

Associate

Silicon Valley

Kraftwerk








Taarini Vohra

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Andy Wagner

Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Cupertino

Silver Lake Group








Frank Walters

Principal

Menlo Park

Partners








Lingchao Wang

Analyst

Hong Kong

Partners








Zheng Wang

Managing Director

Hong Kong

Partners








Jason White

Director

Menlo Park

Partners








Mike Widmann

Senior Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Lee Wittlinger

Director

Menlo Park

Partners








Phillip Wood-Smith

Principal

New York

Partners








Raymond Wu

Principal

Menlo Park

Sumeru








Seda Yalçinkaya

Director and General Counsel of EMEA

London

Silver Lake Group








Shinian Ye

Associate

Hong Kong

Partners








Yuchen Zhang

Associate

Shanghai

Partners








David Zhang

Analyst

Menlo Park

Partners








Mark Zhu

Associate

Menlo Park

Partners








Linda Zhu

Analyst

Hong Kong

Partners

That's just a bit more than 6 people....
Quote

Originally posted by: snidely333
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: alanleroyII
Quote

Originally posted by: forkushV
Quote

Originally posted by: hoops2
"Hobby Lobby would still have to make the other 16 birth control options available"

They already agreed to make the other forms available. They objected to the abortion type drugs...
So what? What if the next corporation objected to all twenty - for religious reasons. Or vaccinations, or blood transfusions, or anti-depressants - for religious reasons.

Would ALL of these religious objections be legitimate. Or are certain religions more equal than others?


In the majority opinion written by Justice Alito, he specifies that the ruling applies only to the contraceptive mandate...
So he's saying that certain religious beliefs are more equal than other beliefs. I guess Christianist beliefs trump 7th Day Adventist beliefs for Alito. And you agree with that?

Does anyone here agree with that?

I didn't say I agree or disagree with this decision. All I'm sayin' is your specific 'what if' regarding "Vaccinations" and "Blood Transfusions" was directly addressed as a non starter as part of the majority opinion. So basically I was just pointing out your error. Carry on.


You miss forkie's point. I agree with his sentiment. I work with a Jehovah Witness. They don't believe in blood transfusions any more than these Hobby Lobby folks believe in contraception.

Is the issue that Hobby Lobby's religion is more mainstream than JH or is it that contraception is less medically required than blood transfusions.

Actually the issue is not whether women will get the coverage, but who will pay for the coverage. When Obama exempted certain religious non-profit groups from paying for female contraceptive coverage he opened the door to this ruling. In those situations, THE INSURANCE COMPANIES were then required to cover, without cost sharing, contraception coverage for female employees.

The Supremes reason that there is no real difference between a for profit and a non profit company. They both have workers who may or may not support the religious beliefs of ownership or management. Therefore, if Obama wishes coverage to be extended that goes against the religious beliefs of corporate ownership, he can simply order the insurance companies to pay for it.....AS HE HAS DONE IN THE PAST.

It was made very clear that this is a narrow ruling covering only 4 specific methods of birth control. Most important: "The court is not ruling on whether women have the right to obtain no-cost contraception, only that the employer isn't the only one who can pay for that coverage."

So, if the ruling is eventually expanded to include "Blood Transfusions" Obama only needs to make the insurance companies pay for it JUST AS HE HAS DONE BEFORE. If the insurance companies lose money he can give them more money. That way it's free for everyone! The religious zealots don't have to pay for something they find abhorrent, Snidely still gets his much needed Blood Transfusion or Birth Control (oops sorry doesn't apply to men), and the insurance companies soak the government for the difference. Everybody wins.

Even hoops2 cuts and pastes better than that.
Liberal Alan Dershowitz calls the decision very insignificant. But, it gives the progressive nuts a chance to yell WAR ON WOMEN!!!! They'll soon turn their attention to looking for an excuse to yell WAR ON GAYS!!!!. Or WAR ON MINORITIES!!!! Or WAR ON WOMEN!!!! again.

Why should a family start from nothing, build a multi-billion dollar business over decades, employ thousands of people and be forced to check their religious beliefs at the company doors just because some politicians need a chance to yell WAR ON WOMEN!!!! to help with the next election?

Hobby Lobby founders have the freedom to practice their religious beliefs and anyone that works for them and doesn't like it has the freedom to find another job if they so choose. A win-win for everybody!

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2014/07/01/dershowitz_hobby_lobby_decision_is_monumentally_insignificant.html
Already a LVA subscriber?
To continue reading, choose an option below:
Diamond Membership
$3 per month
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Limited Member Rewards Online
Join Now
or
Platinum Membership
$50 per year
Unlimited access to LVA website
Exclusive subscriber-only content
Exclusive Member Rewards Book
Join Now